A smaller field will be in the National Invitation Tournament this season. Better known as the NIT, this yearโs version will be played in the state of Texas, with games at the Comerica Center in Frisco and the UNT Coliseum in Denton, home of the North Texas Mean Green, who are actually in the South Region of the NCAA Tournament.
The NIT is usually littered with great betting opportunities for astute college basketball bettors. All eyes are focused on March Madness, but varying levels of motivation often create good spots.
This yearโs NIT is different all the way around. Along with a venue change from Madison Square Garden, which is notorious for being one of the best college basketball under arenas, there were no automatic qualifiers. Usually teams that win the regular season in mid-major conferences but donโt get into the NCAA Tournament are on hand. This yearโs field is made up exclusively of at-large teams and doesnโt really feature anybody from a small or true mid-major.
In any event, weโll preview the NIT and look for some betting opportunities and angles.
The NIT Participants
The 16 teams for the NIT are broken into groups of four, where weโll see 1 vs. 4 and 2 vs. 3 in the first round, which will be played from March 17-20. The quarterfinals are March 25 with the winners of those first-round games. The semifinals are March 27 and the title game and third place game will take place March 28.
Odds are from DraftKings Sportsbook:
Ole Miss +500
Memphis +550
Saint Louis +550
Colorado State +800
Davidson +900
Boise State +1000
Saint Maryโs +1300
Toledo +1700
Richmond +1800
NC State +2000
SMU +2000
Western Kentucky +2000
Buffalo +2300
Dayton +2500
Mississippi State +2500
Louisiana Tech +3000
Western Kentucky at +2000 isnโt a bad pull. This is a really good team that, if motivated, has a star in Charles Bassey and can make a big push. Most of these lines are going to be pretty reasonable, so you wonโt see a ton of big favorite situations. Teams with short prices are teams that would rather be in the NCAA Tournament instead of playing in the NIT in Texas.
A team like Buffalo at +2300 even makes some sense with a high-percentage outlook on offense. They get to the rim a lot and donโt play many great defensive teams en route to the potential semifinals.
The following first-round betting lines are from BetMGM Sportsbook:
Top Left
1. Colorado State (-2, 154.5)
4. Buffalo (Friday March 19)
2. Davidson (-1.5, 139.5)
3. NC State (Thursday March 18)
Colorado State was one of the Last Four Out for the NCAA Tournament field. Louisville is actually the first alternate in the event that a team cannot meet the COVID protocols and requirements for entry to Indianapolis. The Rams have to be fairly disappointed to be here.
Both first-round games will be played at UNT Coliseum.
Colorado State (-2, 154.5) vs. Buffalo
Buffalo is an interesting matchup for Colorado State. Both teams are well-coached and the Bulls will look to push the tempo. They also get to the rim a lot. They donโt take many threes, but get lots of high-percentage looks at the rim. Colorado Stateโs two-point defense is much, much worse than its three-point defense. Teams took a ton of threes against the Rams.
Colorado State also took a lot of threes and Buffalo heads into the NIT with the fourth-best 3P% defense. I lean Buffalo in this game.
Davidson (-1.5, 139.5) vs. NC State
Davidson and NC State are both better on the offensive side. The Wildcats are actually 17th in the nation in eFG% offense and eighth in 2P%. Theyโve shot just shy of 57% inside the arc and 36% outside of it up until this point. NC State is a top-50 offense from three, though the Wolfpack arenโt chucking threes often.
NC State turns opponents over at a high rate, but doesnโt do anything else well defensively. The expected slow tempo of this game is keeping the total low, as Davidson ranks 339th in adjusted tempo. Davidson is high-variance in that the Wildcats take a lot of threes and a lot of long jumpers.
A slight lean towards NC State, who does come from a better conference and has fared better in close games. Davidson is 1-5 in games decided by six or fewer points.
Bottom Left
1. Memphis (-4.5, 137.5)
4. Dayton (Saturday March 20)
2. Boise State (-1, 145.5)
3. SMU (Thursday March 18)
Memphis has to be bummed not to be in the NCAA Tournament. Most rankings and metrics sites had the Tigers ranked much, much higher than most of the at-large teams that grabbed bids. Boise State played itself off the bubble late in the season. Dayton still has to be stinging because the Flyers could very well have been a #1 seed in the 2020 NCAA Tournament with Obi Toppin, but it was canceled because of COVID-19.
Boise State/SMU will be played at the Comerica Center in Frisco and Memphis/Dayton will be played at UNT Coliseum.
Memphis (-4.5, 137.5) vs. Dayton
Dayton got swept in three games by archrival VCU, including their loss in the A-10 Tournament. Dayton had a couple of nice wins, including a sweep of Saint Louis, but one of those came when the Billikens were fresh off of a COVID pause.
There are two areas of concern here for Dayton. The first is that Memphis was one of the best defensive teams in the country. The second is that Memphis has a high TO% on defense and Dayton failed to take care of the basketball this season. On the other hand, Memphis also turned it over a lot and was horrendous at the free throw line, which is why the Tigers are in the NIT and not the NCAAT.
Six of Memphisโs eight losses came in close games because Penny Hardawayโs team doesnโt pay a lot of attention to the details. Dayton just isnโt that great of a team this year. Memphis has big advantages on the glass. If the Tigers are sufficiently motivated, they should cover this number. We donโt really know if they are or not, but this is a young team that should be excited to have more chances to play.
I like Memphis -4.5 here.
Boise State (-1, 145.5) vs. SMU
Boise State rides a four-game losing streak into this game and those four losses likely kept them out of the NCAA Tournament. You have to wonder if Leon Riceโs team can get amped up to play in the NIT or if theyโre just ready for this season to be over. Remember, Boise State started 13-1 and 9-0 in league play before hitting the meat of the schedule.
SMU went from a COVID pause right into the AAC Tournament. The Mustangs didnโt play from February 8 until March 12 and lost by three to Cincinnati. It would be hard to expect them to be in tip-top shape for this game, if they even want to bother playing. At least they are close to home.
I donโt know what to do with this game. I question the motivation for both teams.
Top Right
1. Saint Louis (-4.5, 136.5)
4. Mississippi State (Saturday March 20)
2. Richmond (Wednesday March 17)
3. Toledo (-2, 154.5)
Some people say Saint Louis deserved a better fate and should be in the field of 68. Richmond was tracking in that direction early. Both A-10 teams ran into COVID pauses that abruptly halted their seasons and threw everything for a loop. Richmond wound up only playing 11 conference games. Saint Louis only played 10.
A chance to end the season on a high note. Will those two teams come in eager and excited?
Saint Louis/Mississippi State will be at Comerica Center and Richmond/Toledo will be at UNT Coliseum.
Saint Louis (-4.5, 136.5) vs. Mississippi State
Mississippi State may seem like an interesting choice, but the Bulldogs are here because other teams said no and Louisville had to keep its schedule open just in case. Seton Hall, St. Johnโs, and others decided to pass on an invitation to the NIT. Frankly, Iโm not sure how Belmont isnโt in this over Mississippi State, but I digress.
The Bulldogs had one Quadrant 1 win and it came against Ole Miss on the road. The Rebels arenโt a great team either. Anytime Mississippi State stepped up in class, it didnโt go well. Is Saint Louis a step up in class? Thatโs a fair question.
Both of these teams are frisky on the offensive glass. I like the over here. Usually we see teams in these low-pressure situations play a little bit faster. Mississippi State plays at a pretty slow tempo, but they should let loose a little here. I would expect Saint Louis to run a little more as well. Neither team shoots that well, but there are a lot of offensive rebounding opportunities and probably a fair number of trips to the free throw line.
Toledo (-2, 154.5) vs. Richmond
This is a fascinating Wednesday game. These two teams are very different. Toledo will chuck shots from anywhere. Richmond is a much more reserved team that takes excellent care of the basketball. Toledo takes good care of the ball as well. There shouldnโt be a lot of wasted possessions in this game, hence the high total.
Toledo was one of the best offenses in the nation, albeit in a MAC league that saw very little defense played. Richmondโs profile really tailed off as the season went along, culminating in an ugly loss to Duquesne in the A-10 Tournament. Iโm not sure how invested Richmond is anymore. The regular season finale loss to Saint Josephโs was also an ugly one.
Chris Mooney is a good head coach, but his team didnโt show much fight late in the year. Toledoโs style of play lends itself well for a format and atmosphere like the NIT. I like the -2 here.
Bottom Right
1. Ole Miss (-6.5, 131.5)
4. Louisiana Tech (Friday March 19)
2. Saint Maryโs (-2, 125.5)
3. Western Kentucky (Wednesday March 17)
This is a pretty decent โregionโ of the NIT. Louisiana Tech was consistently one of the best teams in Conference USA this season. Saint Maryโs is almost always on the national landscape. Western Kentucky was also a strong team most of the year in C-USA. Ole Miss is a well-coached team that struggled mightily when stepping up in class, but then also lost some games that shouldnโt have gone down as losses.
Both games will be at the Comerica Center.
Ole Miss (-6.5, 131.5) vs. Louisiana Tech
This should be the right type of matchup for Louisiana Tech to have success. The Bulldogs are far better defensively than they are offensively. Ole Miss does not shoot the basketball particularly well, including a sub-30% 3P%. This also looks to be a slow-paced game, as Ole Miss, who is the better team, ranks in the 300s in adjusted tempo.
My strongest look for the first round of the NIT is Louisiana Tech +6.5 here. In a game that will not be an up-and-down affair, with an Ole Miss team that lost to good teams, but also lost to Dayton, Georgia, Mississippi State, and Vanderbilt, I cannot trust the Rebels.
Saint Maryโs (-2, 125.5) vs. Western Kentucky
Western Kentucky worked in a spotlight non-conference game against Houston on February 25 and got blown out by 24 points. This is a chance at some measure of retribution with the NIT. This is a WKU team that beat Alabama and Memphis earlier this season, so this team has a ceiling. On the other hand, what is the mindset of WKU after losing to North Texas in the C-USA Final in overtime? This is not where this team wants to be.
Saint Maryโs only wound up playing 12 conference games. Three were against Gonzaga and none of those went well. BYU also comfortably beat Saint Maryโs twice. This is not a very good version of the Gaels. The COVID pauses didnโt help, but this is a really poor offensive team.
I like the slight underdog here in Western Kentucky. As long as WKU is motivated, this is a really good team.