The Sabres vs. Bruins series shifts to Boston with the matchup tied, and I believe their strong home record will play a key role here. The Bruins went 29-11-1 at home during the regular season, and I’m backing them to take the series lead.
Quick pick Sabres vs Bruins
- Best bet: Boston Bruins moneyline (-110)
- Confidence: 3 out of 5
- Win probability: Boston 57% | Buffalo 43%
- Best value angle: Market at dead-even odds ignores home ice, Swayman’s series edge, and Luukkonen’s compounding confidence problem.
Series so far
- G1 BUF 4-3
- G2 BOS 4-2
Why this bet has value
The market has this game priced at even money on both sides, which is a reasonable reflex after a 1-1 split. But the series is not as equal as that scoreline implies. Game 2 exposed a significant goaltending gap that the moneyline has not fully priced in.
At 5-on-5, the game was close – Boston led shot attempts 39-37 and scoring chances 19-18. Buffalo was not outplayed structurally. But the Sabres left 9 high-danger chances to Swayman, who stopped 8 of them. Meanwhile Luukkonen allowed 4 goals on 19 shots before being pulled 16 seconds into the third period, including a goal from the red line that took a calamitous bounce over his glove. His combined save percentage across 2 games is .821 – that is not sustainable on either end.
Even money on Boston at home, with the better goaltender, the NHL’s perfect penalty kill through 2 games, and an energized TD Garden crowd represents genuine value. The market is pricing this as a coinflip. The underlying evidence says it is not.
Game snapshot
- Matchup: Buffalo Sabres at Boston Bruins
- Date and time: Thursday, April 23, 2026 – 7 p.m. ET
- Venue: TD Garden, Boston, MA
- Series score: Tied 1-1 (Buffalo won Game 1 4-3; Boston won Game 2 4-2)
- Broadcast: TNT, truTV, HBO Max, NESN, MSG-B, SN360, TVAS2
Matchup breakdown
Key storylines
This series has a consistent pattern through 2 games: Boston jumps to a multi-goal lead, Buffalo claws back in the third period with a surge of late energy. Boston blew a late lead in Game 1 and surrendered it entirely. In Game 2 they held on, aided by a Sturm timeout that halted Buffalo’s momentum after Byram and Krebs scored quickly to make it 4-2. The core question entering Game 3 is whether Boston can do what Buffalo has done both times – build a lead and protect it – or whether this same script repeats on Boston ice.
What happened last game
The box score reads 4-2 for Boston but the underlying game at 5-on-5 was notably competitive. Buffalo had a 36-shot night and generated the series’ most high-danger looks, but ran into a Swayman wall. Boston’s second line – Arvidsson, Zacha, and Mittelstadt – responded to coach Marco Sturm’s public challenge with 3 goals and 5 points after a scoreless Game 1. Viktor Arvidsson scored twice, the second on a 2-on-1 rush just 16 seconds into the third that effectively ended Luukkonen’s night. The decisive stretch came entirely in the second period, when Boston outscored Buffalo 3-0. A fluky bounce off a Geekie dump-in from center ice became the 2-0 goal that broke the game open. Luukkonen looked sharp early, but that puck changed his evening and his game unraveled from there.
What changed
Boston made no lineup changes between games. Sturm’s message to the second line was the primary adjustment, and it delivered. For Buffalo, Luukkonen’s early pull introduced Alex Lyon in relief – Lyon did not allow a goal on 7 shots in Game 2. The key question for Game 3 is whether Ruff sticks with Luukkonen or turns to Lyon, who has been described as capable of a No. 1 role. Neither starter has been officially confirmed as of writing, but Luukkonen is expected to start based on typical playoff convention. If he does start and shows any hesitancy early, Lyon is now a live option. No new injuries have been reported for either team.
Recent form
Buffalo won Game 1 on a stunning late comeback at home. Boston absorbed that and went on the road to win Game 2 convincingly before things got tense late. The Bruins have now demonstrated they can win in Buffalo and score at least 3 in every game of this series. The Sabres have shown they can push back in the third period but have not yet shown they can win away from home in this series – Game 3 is their first road test.
Goaltending
Jeremy Swayman has been the difference through 2 games. His combined save percentage sits above .940 and he made 8 saves on 9 high-danger chances in Game 2 per MoneyPuck data. He has won 9 consecutive regular-season starts against Buffalo in his career. His .908 regular-season save percentage represented a strong bounce-back from a poor 2024-25 season, and he looks locked in now. Luukkonen’s series has been the opposite story. A combined .821 save percentage with one pulled start creates a real confidence issue heading into a hostile building. Even if the 5-on-5 play stays even, this goaltending gap tilts the game toward Boston.
Key skaters
David Pastrnak leads all skaters with 5 points in the series on 1 goal and 4 assists. His power-play production has been central – Boston has converted on 2 of its power play chances while Buffalo has scored 0 for 9. Tage Thompson is the Sabres’ most dangerous forward and generated consistent looks at Swayman, but has been held off the scoresheet in dangerous situations. Josh Doan has accumulated 12 shot attempts through 2 games and is expected to grow as the series continues. Viktor Arvidsson’s emergence as Boston’s secondary scorer with 2 goals in Game 2 changes the threat calculus for Ruff’s defensive pairs.
Team performance and metrics
| Metric | Buffalo | Boston | Betting impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Game 2 5-on-5 | 37 shot attempts, 18 chances | 39 shot attempts, 19 chances | Even – neither team dominated |
| Series chance quality | Strong volume, generating high-danger looks | Disciplined structure, relying on counterattack | Slight Buffalo edge in raw generation, offset by goaltending |
| Special teams | 0-for-9 on PP; PK not tested heavily | 2-for-7 on PP; 9-for-9 PK this series | Clear Boston edge – PP converting, PK dominant |
| Goaltending | Luukkonen .821 combined, pulled G2 | Swayman .940+ combined, 8/9 HD saves G2 | Significant Boston edge |
| Home ice | First road game of series | 29-11-1 at TD Garden in regular season | Boston advantage |
| Depth scoring | Krebs and Byram scoring but top line quiet | Second line exploded in G2 (3G, 5P) | Boston has more trusted secondary options right now |
The game script most likely to repeat: Boston builds an early lead on Swayman’s steadiness and the second line’s momentum, Buffalo pushes back in the third. The key variable is whether the Bruins can hold a lead on home ice better than they did in Game 1, and whether Luukkonen stabilizes or compounds his trouble.
Market and odds analysis
Both sides are priced at -110, implying a 52.4% win probability for each team. That reflects the 1-1 split in results. But results alone are a blunt instrument here. The underlying game quality, home-ice advantage at TD Garden, Boston’s perfect penalty kill, Swayman’s form, and Luukkonen’s pulled-starter status collectively push Boston’s true win probability above 55%. At -110, the implied breakeven is 52.4% –meaning Boston at -110 offers a genuine, if modest, edge.
| Market | Odds |
|---|---|
| Moneyline – Boston | -110 |
| Moneyline – Buffalo | -110 |
| Total | 6.5 (Over +108 / Under -132) |
| Puckline Buffalo +1.5 | -260 |
The under is heavily juiced at -132, reflecting oddsmakers’ expectation of a defensive game. With Swayman in dominant form and the question marks around Luukkonen, a lower-scoring game where Boston controls the margin is a plausible script. But the total market is efficient given the price – there is no strong edge there. The moneyline is where the value sits.
Key edges Sabres vs. Bruins
- Swayman is playing at a level the moneyline does not adequately compensate for – his high-danger save rate in this series is elite and directly counteracts Buffalo’s offensive generation advantage.
- Boston’s penalty kill is a perfect 9-for-9 this series. Buffalo’s power play has been completely neutralized, eliminating one of the Sabres’ strongest regular-season weapons.
- TD Garden home ice is significant – Boston went 29-11-1 there in the regular season and the crowd will carry real momentum into a potential 2-1 series lead.
- Luukkonen’s .821 combined save percentage is a below-replacement-level performance. Even if he starts and stabilizes, he carries a confidence deficit into an intimidating road environment.
Risk factors
Swayman sways: The 5-on-5 play has been even, meaning Boston’s edge is largely goaltending-dependent – and goaltending can swing sharply.
Luukkonen bounce-back: Goalies frequently respond after poor performances. A locked-in Luukkonen who mirrors Lyon’s 7-save shutout relief performance would change the equation quickly.
Buffalo third-period identity: The Sabres have now twice shown the ability to generate a frantic late push. If Boston allows them back into it, the game is genuinely in doubt.
Goaltender uncertainty: If Ruff pivots to Lyon as starter – a legitimate option given the circumstances –the goaltending gap narrows considerably, as Lyon has a similar regular-season profile to Swayman.
Prediction and verdict Sabres vs Bruins
- Best bet: Boston Bruins moneyline (-110)
- Win probability: Boston 57% | Buffalo 43%
- Edge: Small to moderate
This is not a bet built on Boston dominance – the underlying 5-on-5 play has been close. It is a bet on a meaningful and repeatable goaltending edge, home ice, and a penalty kill that has completely shut down one of Buffalo’s primary weapons. Even money on a team with those three advantages in a playoff game is value. The margin is real but not wide, which is why confidence sits at 3 out of 5.
Final score prediction: Boston 3, Buffalo 2
We’re covering all the games in the NHL playoffs with our predictions.
